2013 Ford C-Max Reviews
It's a lot more like a large car -- or a truck -- than the usual minivan or crossover, and it maintains a little of that high-up operating position that people appear to desire.
There's lots of space for a household of four plus baggage or goods. Managing was decent; if I moved from a minivan to your C-Max like a daily driver, I'd contemplate it a pleasing update.
For chores and food runs, this limited range works very effectively. If repeated fits of long-distance luggage-hauling have been in the potential buyer's future, a traditional C-Max will be a better option.
I did so benefit from the strangely silent, smooth and linear sense of-the C-Max Energi in style. If EVs would be the potential, then I suppose the C-Max Energi gives a to you -- in 10-mile bursts, at the very least.
Therefore the C-Max is eminently practical. Customers are spending a considerable premium for that opportunity of inserting their vehicle in every day and every night (assuming their jobs have receiving locations). It may be worth the additional cost, when the reported mixed fuel economy of 100 mpg was achievable. I do not believe any of our testers accomplished an effect anywhere near that, since many of us have trips that come in the selection of the average American's.
The interior is much better organized than a number of Ford's choices, like the (presumably) Blackberry-circa-2003-inspired system about the Fiesta. Therefore enchanting, actually, that I was nearly too busy attempting to increase performance by well to, you understand, drive.
That mentioned, the C-Max -- whether in plug-in or normal hybrid guise -- has become the car that many crossover individuals ought to be getting. It's the easy access and vantage point that lots of transport pod-purchasers desire minus the stigma related to wagons.
send-off you see after turning was good, but do we have to provide unbearable anymore encouragement? to eco-drivers
The C-Max seems airy, having a total of four little windows over the area.
Honda might begin with removing a few of the costly features, like the power lift entrance.
The C-Max seems a lot more like a minivan than sleekly created, and fits perfectly in to the Ford style family.
Energy in the hybrid system forces the C-Max acceptably, and I also got used towards the regenerative braking now.
What's me reluctant to suggest this people hauler may be the premium cost.
The plug-in will be a strong choice for eco-minded retirees. It has lots of room for grandchildren, could be designed with a rear copy camera and is simple to enter and out of. The only real senior-friendly function it's lacking is blind place recognition technology -- as an alternative Ford equips us by having an lengthy side mirror.
I want Ford would bring within the standard, fuel driven C-Max having a lower cost.
PUBLISHER WES RAYNAL: I love the C-Max usually. It's very useful, there's a lot of space, and it's comfortable to travel. In my opinion the C-Max plug-in uses simply the same powertrain whilst the cross we'd in here a couple weeks before, the 2.0-liter four-cylinder gas engine coupled to an electrical motor. The largest huge difference is just a larger battery that may get the very first 20 some thing miles on battery only. That costs an additional $7,700 to you based on the Ford web site.
They're too sensitive. It's difficult to decrease easily for me. Perhaps I'm also pork fisted.
This specific D Max is nice enough on the highway. The framework feels strong and the suspension feels properly adjusted for a suitable ride/handling combination.
2013 Ford C-Max
- More Photos